MP4-25, надеемся, что не опять двадцать пять... Опции

[Марат]

а наши вообще то эту систему реально разрабатывали? мож просто пургу гнали и нагнетали обстановку, что скоро её применим, и вынудили фиадарасов выпустить сей документ
теперь остается выяснить, изменяется ли подвеска у бычья в действительности или нет

очень надеюсь, что мы именно добивались буквального запрета (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[Fantom]

очень надеюсь, что мы именно добивались буквального запрета (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Гибкое днище, демперы масс, гибкое крыло - если не изменяет память, то все три примочки были забанены с подачи МакЛарена. Стало быть действительно им проще конкурента слить, нежели аналог сделать. Хотя маковский НИОКР один из самых оперативных.

[fanatMclaren]

Гибкое днище, демперы масс, гибкое крыло - если не изменяет память, то все три примочки были забанены с подачи МакЛарена. Стало быть действительно им проще конкурента слить, нежели аналог сделать. Хотя маковский НИОКР один из самых оперативных.

Не ну днище было грех не слить, тем более обладая чертежами....

[SInhouse]

где можно посмотреть характеристики MP4-25?

[Fantom]

где можно посмотреть характеристики MP4-25?

McLaren Technology Centre
Chertsey Road, Woking,
Surrey, GU21 4YH
Tel: +44 (0) 1483 261 900

заходишь и спрашиваешь мистера Лоу.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[SInhouse]

заходишь и спрашиваешь мистера Лоу.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

он "Do you speak Russian?" ))

[project200]

С финансовой точки зрения очень замечательно, что в Китае получился победный дубль.

[Tcyan]

что, проставился у буков на дубль? Смело... :-D

[fanatMclaren]

Будут у нас то серьёзные обновления к Барселоне? Короткую базу к Монако будут делать или при нынешних условиях нет? Просто на фоне новостей из станов соперников, становится тревожно.

[Fantom]

Будут у нас то серьёзные обновления к Барселоне? Короткую базу к Монако будут делать или при нынешних условиях нет? Просто на фоне новостей из станов соперников, становится тревожно.

Если Мерсы перед началом сезона смогли омологировать длиннобазный монокок, который выкатят к Испании, то и Маки могли под Хунгару с Монако аналогичный шаг сделать. Слухи вроде ходили, даже в начале этой темы посты были.

К Барсе наши планировали обновления комплексные, но сомневаюсь, что тачку надо перекраивать серъезно. Дотачивать имеющееся у Маков лучше всегда получалось.
Так что революции планируются только у Фур и Мерсов.
Кстати, Мерсы на данной версии В вроде планировали наклонный движок испробовать, по примеру РБР с Феррами, так что может и наши в этой области поэксперементируют, раз уж подвеску читить запретили.))

[project200]

что, проставился у буков на дубль? Смело... :-D

нее, я не про себя, я про команду. Китай сейчас оооочень лакомый кусочек с точки зрения приобретения спонсоров

[Марат]

Интервью с ТиДжи в свете желания команды снова встать на рельсы "КЕРС-инклюзив-инжиниринга" в будущем:

Q. It's been suggested that the 2013 engine regulations will be based on 1.5 litre turbos with KERS. Is that a concept McLaren would support?

Tim Goss - McLaren's Chief Engineer for MP4-25: As far as 2013 is concerned, I think Formula 1 does need to move on, and show it is aligned with the fuel efficiency age. We fully support all that the Engine Working Group and FOTA are doing in that direction. The concept of a normally-aspirated 2.4-litre V8 is getting a bit dated. Moving to turbocharging and KERS is the right thing to do.

Formula 1 does need to maintain itself as the pinnacle of motorsport and engine performance, so it needs an engine formula that is associated with high performance, but also fuel efficiency. Overall it's moving in the right direction and we fully support it.

Q. How urgent is it to know what's happening with tyres for 2011?

TG: Obviously we're well into designing next year's car and as always as an engineer, you want to know what the regulations are before you design the car. It makes it a little bit more difficult but in some ways makes it a little bit more exciting and challenging. As far as the tyre is concerned, we need to know what the performance of the front and rear tyres will be so that we can get the fundamental balance right. The profile of the tyres also provides a reference in terms of front and rear wings.

The tyre shape both loaded and unloaded is important aerodynamically. You optimistic your front wing to the efficiency of the tyre. So the shape and size of the tyre, and the wheel, are important aerodynamically.

As engineers we'd love to have all that information. But we understand it's a difficult process.

Q. How far are you from a critical time in terms of needing to know those details?

TG: At the moment I'd say it's not critical, but clearly the sooner we know the better. Even if we do know the size, it will take some time to start working with it and understand how we're going to ascertain the relative performance of the tyres, the characteristics and the degradation.

Q. Can you explain why in some recent races Lewis Hamilton has gone well in practice, Q1 and Q2, then it's gone away from him in Q3?

TG: Both China and Australia were slightly different situations. In Australia we were obviously all a bit shocked and surprised by our qualifying performance. When we looked at it afterwards and did a lot of analysis, and in the end we believe it came down to tyre preparation - we didn't get the tyres into the requisite for performance in qualifying, we just got that slightly out, and Lewis never really hooked it up.

In China we were particularly competitive through practice, Q1 and Q2, then coming into Q3 the wind changed and picked up a little bit, and that caught Lewis out into Turn 11. He made just a very small mistake and missed his line, but actually the repercussions of that were pretty big. Consequently he underperformed to his expectations.

In terms of Australia it was our own advice to Lewis, and in China he just made a very slight mistake.

Q. What will be the most interesting aspect of the updates for Spain?

TG: You'll notice the front wing and the rear wing, both of which are having changes. On top of that, there will be fairly small and subtle changes elsewhere to the car. At the rear of the car, there will be some changes to the floor at the back. But if you want to look out for anything, then look out for the front wing and the rear wing.

Q. How much improvement in qualifying pace do you feel you've made since Bahrain, and do you feel you can get among the Red Bulls at Barcelona?

TG: We certainly have closed the gap. After the Barcelona test at the end of February, we were quite confident that we were there or thereabouts. We were a little bit taken aback in Bahrain. We were some way off, especially off the Red Bulls. But we brought some significant changes to the car for Malaysia and we really expected to be quite competitive in qualifying in Malaysia. Obviously as things transpired, we made a few mistakes with our weather predictions, so we never actually got to demonstrate that.

In China, bar the slip-up Lewis had in qualifying, we proved that we had closed the gap in qualifying. We were probably only 0.2-0.3s off Red Bull in qualifying trim in China. Barcelona depends very much on the technical changes and the results of the upgrades.

We've made a big step forward, but the other teams like Red Bull, Mercedes is making some significant changes, Ferrari have announced that they are going to bring their own drag reduction rear wing, so I think it's very difficult to make predictions for Barcelona. Although I'd like to think that we can put a car on the front row in Barcelona.

Q. Jean Todt says he is serious about the return of KERS. Would you like to see it back, and if so can it wait until 2013 or should it return as early as 2011?

TG: We fully support what FOTA and the FIA are trying to do in terms of KERS. Clearly to introduce it for next season, it's starting to get a little bit late in the day. But there are lots of people working on this. We understand the need for KERS for the association with road car technology, and we think it's the right thing to bring it back. Really we'll just go along with whatever FOTA and the FIA decide.

Q. How possible is Ferrari and Renault's suggestion that KERS can be both cheaper and more powerful in 2011?

TG: We've learned an awful lot since we were designing the system for 2011. It's realistic to keep the costs down and put the power up. But probably the knock-on effect of that is that it's going to be a little bit bigger and a little bit heavier. A lot of the improvements we made to our KERS last year were in the ability to downsize it and make it easier to package in the car and get the weight distribution correct. It's possible.


перевод в сети есть. но будем делать свой.. на главной, as soon as possible